FinOps & Cost Optimization

Cut cloud waste without slowing growth
I implement a practical FinOps model: real cost visibility, governance guardrails and continuous workload optimization.

At a glance

Who it's for

CTOs, IT Directors and platform leads at European scale-ups and SMBs whose Azure spend is growing faster than the business, with weak forecasting or a post-migration bill nobody owns.

What I do here

I set up an operational FinOps model: real cost visibility, shared ownership between engineering and finance, continuous optimization. Not just reports: processes, accountability and concrete saving levers.

Typical outcomes

Cloud spend down 20-30% in the first months, reliable forecasting, per-team accountability, and a FinOps baseline the client can run on its own afterwards.

FinOps Services

Cost Analysis & Reporting

Dashboards and reporting by cost center, team and product. Make decisions with clear data, not at month end.

Budget Management

Budgets, guardrails and preventive alerts to avoid overruns and improve accountability across finance and engineering.

Resource Optimization

Rightsizing, reservation strategy and cleanup of unused resources to reduce waste without service impact.

FinOps Tools

Azure Cost Management

Cost Analysis Budgets & Alerts Cost Recommendations Resource Tagging Spending Limits

Automation & Monitoring

Azure Automation Power BI Dashboards Logic Apps Azure Functions Azure Monitor

Optimization Services

Azure Advisor Reserved Instances Azure Spot VMs Auto-scaling Resource Rightsizing

Governance & Policies

Azure Policy Management Groups RBAC Resource Locks Compliance Frameworks

Delivered FinOps Projects

Enterprise FinOps Framework

Introduced tagging, showback and budget policies across multiple teams and subscriptions.

Outcome: stronger spend control and significant cost reduction in the first quarters.

Startup FinOps Implementation

FinOps setup for a fast-growing scale-up: continuous monitoring and progressive optimization.

Outcome: reduced compute costs and better cloud burn predictability.

Multi-Cloud Cost Governance

Unified spend governance across heterogeneous cloud environments with centralized reporting.

Outcome: stronger cost transparency and faster decisions on spending priorities.

Frequently asked questions on FinOps

When does it make sense to start a FinOps engagement?

When cloud costs grow faster than the business, when there's no clear ownership of the bill, or when the last invoice surprised the CFO. You don't need hundreds of workloads: you need a predictability or accountability problem.

Do you work only on Azure or also on other clouds?

Main focus is Azure, where I have certifications and direct experience. On multi-cloud scenarios I work on governance and unified reporting; for deep AWS or GCP optimization I collaborate with dedicated specialists.

How is a typical FinOps engagement structured?

In phases: an assessment to clean up visibility and tagging, immediate quick wins to generate ROI early, then governance and process (budgets, alerts, accountability), finally enablement of the internal team. We often start from a narrow domain, not from the whole estate.

What to expect in the first 30 days?

Reliable cost visibility, three to five prioritized quick wins, a shared tagging strategy draft and a first concrete spend reduction. If no quick wins surface in the first 30 days, the engagement is poorly framed.

Bring order to your cloud spend

If cloud costs are growing faster than your roadmap, we can set up a concrete and measurable FinOps plan.